Boston, Oct 17, ‘45

 

Dear Spooner,

     Had I found, on my return hither, yesterday, half of the city gone into the country, leaving yourself behind, I should not have felt the loss half so deeply as I have felt your sudden departure for Athol.  And my sorrow is no-win [?] diminished by the occasion of your absence. But I’ll hope to see you back soon. Your requests, touching Mrs. Hildreth & her worse half, and that pretty Mrs. Sargeant, I will, of course, comply with.

     At Brookfield, I had a conversation with a lawyer, who insisted, as many others, as most others, insist, that all inferior courts are bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States; that, for example, the latter having decided, in the case of Prigg vs. Penn., that the slaveowner has a right to take his slave wherever he finds him, Judge Shaw nor Judge Story would have had any right to discharge Geo. Latimer [?]; that, to take another example, should the Sup. C. of the U.S. decide a certain case, now pending before it, in favor of the rumsellers, no State Court, no Judge of the U.S. Sup. C. with in his local jurisdiction, would have a right to decide any similar case against the rumsellers. The lawyer quoted the U.S. Const., and contended, that any other view of the matter would involve ananely[?]. I admitted, that the general, if not the universal, practice of the inferior courts had been in favor of his view; but contended, that there is nothing in the Constitution plainly prohibiting any inferior court from deciding all cases, legitimately before it, according to its own understanding of the Constitution, without of all regarding any decisions of the Sup. Court. I was unable, of course, cite [sic] precedents for my opinion. Are there any? Is my opinion itself sound, and therefore defensible? Can you give me some light on this subject? And can you let me have it as early as Wednesday next, at Worcester, where I am to be on the evening of that day? If so, address me to the lane of Wm. White. I have an appointment for Wednesday, the 29th imt.[?], at North Brookfield, where, among never so many other ____, I am especially requested to discuss the Constitutional question, and all in a single speech! But this appointment, I have attempted to get altered to next Thursday evening, the 29th imt.[?] Could you get a letter to me, at North Brookfield,---care of Chas. Adams, Jr., Esq.,--- on Thursday, ‘twould be in time. I should state, however, that I think it very doubtful if the time already fixed will be allowed to be changed.

     I saw Judge Allen, yesterday. He spoke highly of yourself; but had not yet found time to read your book; of which, I told him, I wished he might think as well, as some of us thought of it, and offer you his opinion of it.

     Give my love to Dr. Hart and his better half. I think it creditable enough to him, that he is even the worse half of such a whole. I wish the Dr. would give her for me one dozen kisses, which, it makes me half mad to think I could have omitted impressing myself.

                                  Truly Yours,

                                  Geo. Bradburn

 

 

Envelope:

Paid: Charge E. Sewell, box 1351

Lysander Spponer, Esq.,

Athol, Mass.

 

From G. Bradburn

Oct. 19, 1845